Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Petrosakh Joint Stock Co. of the Closed Type

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 6, 1997No. Civil Action G-96-537PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KENT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this wrongful death action on September 24, 1996. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Quash; Alternatively Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction of October 28, 1996. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is GRANTED,

In 1995, Barry Williamson, husband and son of the respective Plaintiffs, was recruited by Nimir Petroleum Company U.S.A., Inc. (“Nimir USA”) to work as a consultant at Defendant Petrosakh Joint Stock Company of the Closed Type’s (“Petrosakh”) refinery in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Schott Glas v. Adame, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Wyatt v. Walt Disney World, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Diggs v. Novant Health, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API