Legal Opinion
Schott Glas v. Adame
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 20, 2005No. 14-04-00560-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of the special appearance of appellant Schott Glas. Concluding the trial court erred in denying the special appearance, we reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
Appellees are a class consisting of veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War, along with their families and others. The suit was filed in June 1994 and alleges that the defendants caused or contributed to their injuries from so-called “Gulf War Syndrome.” In September 1995, appellees named as additional defendants Schott Glas, a German commercial…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- American Type Culture Collection, Inc. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- PHC-Minden, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- Olympia Capital Associates, L.P. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- W & F Transportation, Inc. v. Wilhelm, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Nogle & Black Aviation, Inc. v. Faveretto Ex Rel. Migliori, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Capital Finance & Commerce AG v. Sinopec Overseas Oil & Gas, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.