Legal Opinion

Keller v. Magic Water Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1968No. 9958, 9965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs John E. Keller and Alfred C. Keller and their wives to quiet title to certain waters of Salmon Falls Creek. Various parties were named as defendants, including appellant Marshall and respondent Magic Water Company. Respondent Magic Water Company answered and filed a cross-claim naming as cross-defendants the plaintiffs-appellants, appellant Marshall and others, who were also named as defendants in the Keller complaint.

The trial court entered its judgment and. decree to the effect that respondent Magic Water Company has a prior and…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Moyer v. PeabodySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rock Creek Ditch & Flume Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Floyd v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rerl. Tappan v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. A & B Irrigation District v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hart v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API