Legal Opinion

A & B Irrigation District v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2014No. Nos. 40974, 40975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises out of the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA) court’s decision on the following basin-wide issue: Does Idaho law require a remark authorizing storage rights to “refill,” under priority, space vacated for flood control? The SRBA court concluded that a remark was not necessary because a storage water right, that is filled cannot refill under priority before affected junior appropriators satisfy their water rights once. The court declined to address when the quantity element of a storage water right is considered filled. Sev.en Magic Valley irrigation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. DeRousse v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Blackfoot v. Gary SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Black Canyon Irrig Dist v. State / Suez WaterIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. United States v. Black Canyon Irrigation DistIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API