Legal Opinion

Gray v. Craig

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1932No. Docket No. 4678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is a motion to submit upon appellant’s opening brief, no points and authorities being filed on behalf of respondents. The motion being granted, we will consider the appeal on its merits.

From the complaint it appears that respondent Craig and the appellant entered into a contract whereby the possession of certain personal property was delivered by respondent Craig to appellant, who agreed to use and care for the same, and to deliver to respondent Craig fifty per cent of the yield therefrom for five years, and if the share delivered amounted to $4,000, appellant was to become the sole…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parke v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Norland v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gray v. GiesekeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. BenatarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Still v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Avina v. SpurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API