Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Board of Parole

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The plaintiff, who is serving a sentence at the Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole* seeks a binding declaration as to (1) whether he was entitled to a hearing upon revocation of his parole by the defendant board, and (2) whether upon return to imprisonment he should have received credit for time elapsed between revocation of parole and arrest. The case was heard upon agreed facts by a single justice, who reserved and reported it without decision to the full court.

In 1956 the plaintiff was sentenced, and on October 31, 1960, was paroled. On November 23, 1960, a parole officer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  2. Riggins v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Woods v. State Board of ParoleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Baxter v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Higgins v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API