Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Robbins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 28, 1970PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

These are appeals by the petitioner Richard W. Higgins in two cases: Richard W. Higgins v. Allan L. Robbins (Superior Court #8576 — Law Court #970), a complaint for mandamus and declaratory judgment, and Richard W. Higgins v. State of Maine and Allan L. Robbins, Warden (Superior Court #8863 — Law Court #975), a post-conviction habeas corpus petition brought under 14 M.R.S.A. § 5502 et seq. The petitioner chose to prosecute pro se both cases before the sitting Justice. On appeal he is represented by Court-appointed counsel. By stipulation and agreement the cases are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Berryhill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  5. Scotten v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King Resources Co. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. Berry v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Morgan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API