Legal Opinion

In Re Otter Tail Power Co. Ex Rel. Big Stone II

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2008No. 24485PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Otter Tail Power Company, on behalf of several utilities, applied for a permit to construct Big Stone II, a coal-fired energy conversion facility. Certain non-profit environmental organizations intervened to oppose the application. They asserted that the carbon dioxide (C02) emissions from Big Stone II would contribute to global warming, thereby posing a threat of serious environmental injury. The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) concluded that although the facility will emit C02, the amount will not pose a threat of serious injury to the environment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wells v. Howe Heating & Plumbing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Tebben v. Gil Haugan Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christenson v. Crowned Ridge Wind, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Pesall v. Montana Dakota Utilities, Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API