In Re Otter Tail Power Co. Ex Rel. Big Stone II
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Otter Tail Power Company, on behalf of several utilities, applied for a permit to construct Big Stone II, a coal-fired energy conversion facility. Certain non-profit environmental organizations intervened to oppose the application. They asserted that the carbon dioxide (C02) emissions from Big Stone II would contribute to global warming, thereby posing a threat of serious environmental injury. The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) concluded that although the facility will emit C02, the amount will not pose a threat of serious injury to the environment.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wells v. Howe Heating & Plumbing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Tebben v. Gil Haugan Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christenson v. Crowned Ridge Wind, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Pesall v. Montana Dakota Utilities, Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015