Legal Opinion

Pesall v. Montana Dakota Utilities, Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2015No. 27324Published

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Montana Dakota Utilities Co. and Otter Tail Power Company (Applicants) filed an application with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) for a permit to construct a high-voltage electrical transmission line. Appellant Gerald Pesall objected to the project because he was concerned that excavating and moving soil to construct the project might unearth and spread a crop parasite. The PUC granted the permit on conditions, including a condition to identify and mitigate the potential parasite problem. The circuit court affirmed. Pesall’s appeal raises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Department of Transportation v. Association of American RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Establishment of Switched Access Rates for U.S. v. AT & T Communications of Midwest Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re the Complaint of Northern States Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API