Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
PRESKA, District Judge.
The Framers based our Constitution on the idea that a separation of powers enables a system of checks and balances, allowing our Nation to thrive under a Legislature and Executive that are accountable to the People, subject to judicial review by an independent Judiciary. See Federalist Paper No. 47 (1788); U.S. Const, arts. I, II, III. While, at times, some judges have become involved with the most critical issues affecting America, political questions are not the proper domain of judges. See, e.g., Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Comer v. Murphy Oil USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Barasich v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep v. WitherspoonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.