Legal Opinion

Lytle v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

— The appellant is the owner of two lots in Sioux City, abutting on a street upon which pavement was laid. To pay the cost of the improvement, special assessments were made upon abutting and adjacent benefited property, including appellant’s lots. He seeks by an action in equity to have the assessment declared void, and the sale of the lots to pay the same enjoined. No question is raised as to the regularity or legality of the proceedings preceding the assessment. It is not seriously contended that the lots were not subject to assessment in some amount. It is well settled that the owner of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Owens v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Clifton Land Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodell v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Rood v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Gingles v. City of OnawaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Persinger v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Estate of Meijerink v. LindsaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API