Woodbridge Bros. v. De Witt
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Wat/ton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action in replevin by Woodbridge Bros, against H. A. De Witt to recover possession of a piano, to wliieh the plaintiffs claimed title under a so-called lease, which was more properly a contract of sale reserving title in the vendors until full payment should be made, with a right to take possession on default of payment. The property was taken under the writ and delivered to the plaintiffs. H. A. De Witt made no appearance. Pauline De Witt intervened, claiming ownership and right of possession in herself. The snit was broiight before a justice of the peace, resulting -in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cole Brothers v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Phenix Iron Works Co. v. McEvonyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Ward v. Spelts & KlostermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. FinckNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Omaha Thompson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. RomboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Story v. GammellNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- West v. WegnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Davis v. Otoe CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.