Phenix Iron Works Co. v. McEvony
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action of replevin by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, to recover an engine, boiler, and other machinery. The plaintiff based its claim on former ownership of the property, which had been parted with in pursuance of a contract of sale which the plaintiff *229claimed it had been induced to enter into by fraudulent misrepresentations. The defendant, the sheriff of Holt county, denied plaintiff’s ownership and right of possession, and also alleged a sale by the plaintiff of the property to one Donald McLean, followed by a pledge of the property to secure a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Franklin v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Camp v. PollockNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Haggard v. WallenNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Randall v. PersonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duffus v. Howard Furnace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Friend Bros. Clothing Co. v. HulbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Vavricka v. Mid-Continent-Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Yager v. Exchange National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Woodbridge Bros. v. De WittNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.