Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1904No. 13,235PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to tlie district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, 0.

In tbis action the plaintiff in the court bel on', who is also plaintiff in error in this court, filed a petition in the district court for Douglas county, Nebraska, alleging that, while in the employ of the defendant railway company as a. switchman in its yards at Omaha, he received serious personal injuries caused by the negligence and carelessness of'defendant. It is not necessary to review the petition further than to say that, on its face, it stated a good cause of action. Defendant answered this petition, denying all the allegations of negligence, and pleaded, by way of accord…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mateer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Wallace v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Cole Brothers v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. New Omaha Thompson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. RomboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Lumley v. Wabash Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grindrod v. Anglo-American Bond Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Simpson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Welch v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Falkner v. Sacks Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API