D.M. v. D.A.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
D.M. and D.A. were involved in a personal relationship from 1985 to 1991 and engaged in a business partnership from 1987 to 1991. This case involves the dissolution and winding up of the partnership and the ownership of a house in which both lived. D.M. claims that the trial court erred in awarding the house to D.A. despite a quitclaim deed from D.A. to D.M. and D.A. and in failing to account for and distribute the assets of the partnership properly.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
D.M. and D.A. began an intimate personal relationship in 1985. Except for a period between March…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Wilson v. MocabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Hofstad v. ChristieWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.