Legal Opinion

Burt v. Ramos

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 29, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00662Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMEL BURT, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00662-CAB-VET 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 14 NICOLAI RAMOS, in his individual capacity, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, 15 [Doc. No. 20] Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Jamel Burt’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Production 19 of Internal Affairs and Past Use of Force Records. Doc. No. 20 (“Motion”). Defendant 20 County of San Diego (the “County”) timely opposed the Motion. Doc. No. 21 21 (“Opposition”). The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  4. Dougherty v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API