Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 26, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Because his lot was located in a wetlands conservancy district, the plaintiff was required to obtain a special permit from the board of appeals in order to construct a house on the lot. The board denied the permit, and the plaintiff sought review of the decision in the Superior Court. A judge of a District Court, sitting under statutory authorization, heard the case in accordance with the standards set forth in Josephs v. Board of Appeals of Brookline, 362 Mass. 290, 295 (1972), made findings of fact and concluded (a) that the plaintiff’s lot was a wetland and was correctly located within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Josephs v. Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prime v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API