Legal Opinion

Patricia Burgos v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1994No. 93-8424PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

The Burgos family appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. on the basis that section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 141-187, preempts their intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. Finding no error, we AFFIRM.

I.FACTS

Oscar Burgos was employed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (“Southwestern Bell”) for over nineteen years. In 1989, Burgos was a non-management employee with the title Communications Technician. He was a member of the labor organization Communications Workers of America, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. C. Richard Brown and Karen Brown v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, James G. Bryan, and Keith DendyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Michael Lee Thomas v. Ltv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Foy v. Giant Food Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Evans v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
  4. Entertainment by J & J, Inc. v. Al-Waha Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  5. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API