Legal Opinion
Chase v. Rieve
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 14, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction and defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss the action present many of the issues considered in Tisa v. Potofsky, D. C. 90 F. Supp. 1175. Familiarity with the opinion in that case will be assumed.
The action is for a permanent injunction and declaratory judgment. Its purpose is to restrain the defendants from taking steps to effect the expulsion of United Office and Professional Workers of America (hereinafter called UOPWA) from the Congress of Industrial Organizations (hereinafter called CIO).
Plaintiffs sue as representatives…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Upjohn Company v. Italian Drugs Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Wood v. City of Topeka, Kan., Topeka Housing Auth.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Local No. 1 (aca), Broadcast Employees of The International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Tisa v. PotofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Heyman v. Ar. Winarick, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Local No. 1 (Aca), Etc. v. Ibt, C., W. & H.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Allen v. Pyrene Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.