Legal Opinion

Aughenbaugh v. North American Refractories Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1967No. Appeal, 388PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from a decree in equity in the court below entering judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant.

On a motion for judgment on the pleadings by the defendant, the complaint, answer and reply to averments of new matter in the answer are considered, and all facts plead by the plaintiff which are relevant and material must be accepted as admitted even though denied. However, inferences and conclusions drawn from a written instrument which is in the record, and asserted conclusions of law should not be considered or accepted as admitted. See…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Babcock & WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Engel v. Parkway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Jones v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Long John Silver's, Inc. v. FioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Kuriger v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API