Legal Opinion
Tucker v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided April 17, 1998No. 2960768PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
On Applications for Rehearing
The opinion of December 12, 1997, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.
In February 1992, Aaron Tucker purchased a new 1992 Chevrolet Camaro automobile from Jim Bishop Chevrolet-GEO-Buick- Olds, Inc. (the "dealership"). After repeatedly having problems with the car, Tucker sued the dealership and the manufacturer, General Motors Corporation ("GM"), alleging that they had breached their implied and express…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Lee v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Wellcraft Marine v. ZarzourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Rampey v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Morris Concrete, Inc. v. WarrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Copenhagen Reinsurance Co. v. CHAMPION HOME BLDRS. CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Rose v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.