Legal Opinion
NRG Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 28, 1991No. Nos. 671-86L and 672-86LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs, NRG Company, Mike T. Gustafson, William Lang, Bedford & Co., Cormorant Corp., Wesco Resources, Inc., and Thermal Energy, Inc., seek damages resulting from the alleged cancellation by the United States of three mineral prospecting permits that authorized the permittees to explore for coal on the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation in Montana. In their respective complaints, plaintiffs allege three distinct theo*53ries for government liability. These cases are presently before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment on one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell Arms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- NRG Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Mitchell Arms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Maritrans Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Belle Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Environmental QualityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.