Legal Opinion

United States v. Salomon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 7, 1935No. 3805PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

A certain bleaching clay was imported at the port of New Orleans, La., and was classified .for duty under paragraph 207, ■ Tariff .Act of 1930, at one-fourth of 1 cent per pound and 30 per centum ad valorem as “clays or earths artificially activated with acid or other material”. The collector in his report referred to it as “fuller’s earth”, and stated that his action was in accordance with the chemist’s analysis of the clay made by the “New York office”. Said report of the chemist, states: “An earth artificially activated with acid or other material. * * *”

The importer protested the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API