Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1989PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant had no right to file a supplemental pro se brief in the Appellate Division and under the circumstances presented we find no abuse of discretion by the court in denying him permission to do so (see, People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [decided herewith]). In affirming, however, we note that the police identification of defendant from a mug shot several weeks later, based upon observation of him at the time of the crime, could not be considered a proper confirmatory identification (see, People v Riley, 70…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. WaringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. AllahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. MunroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API