Legal Opinion

State v. Page

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1994No. 92-6528; CA A81247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for violating OAR 635-05-200, which, through ORS 506.991, makes it a misdemeanor to “possess or land pink shrimp from any one trip or landing which exceeds an average count of 160 whole shrimp per pound.” We affirm.

Defendant is a commercial shrimper. On August 22, 1992, state police officers observed shrimp being unloaded from defendant’s fishing vessel to the Bornstein’s Seafood Plant. Unofficial shrimp samples taken by Bornstein employees revealed counts that ranged from 180 to 190 shrimp per pound. Based on those unofficial counts, the officers sampled…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Murphy v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API