Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1938No. 27013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

“A municipal corporation is charged with the duty of exercising ordinary care in keeping its streets and sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition, so that persons can pass along them in the ordinary methods of travel with reasonable safety.” City of Silvertown v. Harcourt, 51 Ga. App. 160 (179 S. E. 772); City of Barnesville v. Sappington, 58 Ga. App. 27 (197 S. E. 342). While it is true that as to defects in or obstructions on a public street, not created in or placed thereon by any of its agents or servants, the city is liable to one sustaining injury by reason thereof only “where it had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. City of Silvertown v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. City of Barnesville v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Wilson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hancock v. City of DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. City of East Point v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. City Council of Augusta v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. City of Bainbridge v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Mayor &C. of Savannah v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API