City of East Point v. Mason
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
Construing the petition against the pleader, it is construed to mean that a small amount of gravel or coarse grain sand was washed from the driveway or carried by foot or vehicle, or other means, in a natural and usual way without being caused by the negligence of Crowe. The only negligence alleged against Crowe and the city is that the gravel was permitted to accumulate and remain on the sidewalk. There are no facts alleged authorizing a conclusion that the negligence of Crowe or the city caused the gravel to be washed or carried onto the sidewalk.
Even if the accumulation of a small amount…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- City of Silvertown v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- City of Barnesville v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Rhodes v. PerlisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- City of Rome v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Misenhamer v. PharrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Associated Distributors, Inc. v. CanupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Mason v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Duren v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Yancey v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.