Legal Opinion

Dempsey v. City of Rome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1894PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Dempsey sued the city for personal injuries. At the conclusion of his evidence, defendant moved for a non-suit upon the grounds that there was no evidence showing the city had notice of the defect in the sidewalk, or *421was guilty of negligence causing the injury; and that the evidence showed that plaintiff, by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence, could have avoided the injury. The nonsuit was granted.

Plaintiff testified: About seven or eight o’clock on the night of December 13, 1891, while walking down Broad street, the most public street in Rome, his foot was caught in a hole in a…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. City Council v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. City of Brunswick v. GlogauerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Samples v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Idlett v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API