Herndobler v. Rippen
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Benson. This is an action by Albert H. Herndobler, a minor, by A. B. Herndobler, his guardian ad litem, against Phillip Rippen, Cecelia Rippen and Cecil Rippen, a minor.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Benson. This is an action by Albert H. Herndobler, a minor, by A. B. Herndobler, his guardian ad litem, against Phillip Rippen, Cecelia Rippen and Cecil Rippen, a minor. Omitting the formal allegations, plaintiff’s complaint is as follows: “That the defendants, on the 16th day of September 1912, invited and requested said Albert H. Herndobler to accompany them on a visit and hunting trip to the ranch of the defendants, in the county of Klickitat, State of Washington, the said ranch being about 20 miles from a town…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Benson
Plaintiff submits two assignments of error, for which his learned counsel earnestly contend: First, it is insisted that there was sufficient competent testimony to support the verdict; and, second, that the court exceeded its powers in entering a judgment of dismissal as to defendants Phillip and Cecelia Eippen.
1. In considering the first of these assignments, it will be noted that the complaint charges active participation in the acts complained of, by all these defendants, and does not allege any parental or guardianship relation, nor Is there any allegation that the defendant Cecil is of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Palm v. IvorsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Hughes v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Moulton v. StaatsUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- German v. Kienow's Food StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Prater v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.