Legal Opinion

Palm v. Ivorson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1905No. Gen. No. 11,392PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

^A father is not liable for the tort of his infant child upon the ground alone that he is the father/] A person who negligently places in the hands of, or authorizes the use by another person of a dangerous instrument or article under such circumstances that he has reason to know that it is likely to produce injury, is liable for the natural and probable consequences of his act to any person injured, who is not himself in fault. The liability of the appellant for the injuries to appellee depends upon whether it can be held, under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Carter v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Harris v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hagerty v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Chaddock v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mautino v. Piercedale Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Charlton v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Prater v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  4. Herndobler v. RippenOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rautbord v. EhmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API