Legal Opinion

Keith Melillo v. Terry Arden Heitland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 2016No. A15-83PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

This case arises from an automobile accident. Respondent Keith Melillo filed a lawsuit against appellant Terry Heitland for personal injuries suffered in the accident. Melillo attempted to serve the summons and complaint on Heitland via certi fied mail. The district court dismissed the suit with prejudice, concluding that Heitland was not properly served before the statute of limitations expired. The court of appeals reversed and remanded, concluding service via certified mail was effective. Because service of process via certified mail does not constitute personal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Stonewall Insurance Co. v. HorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Noel Michaud v. Sarah DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Crossetti v. Cargill, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  5. Gach v. LatvaahoDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API