Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Kawasaki Kisen Kasha, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 25, 2008No. C 07-06148 WHAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This order holds that all claims by a shipper for damage to cargo under a bill of lading for seaborne carriage between a United States port and a foreign port are exclusively governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act and federal maritime law, thus preempting application of state-law claims. Removal to federal court of such a complaint is therefore authorized even though it may be pled solely in terms of state-law claims. As such, plaintiffs motion to remand is Denied.

STATEMENT

In September of 2006 a large shipment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M3 Midstream LLC v. South Jersey Port Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API