Continental Insurance v. Kawasaki Kisen Kasha, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This order holds that all claims by a shipper for damage to cargo under a bill of lading for seaborne carriage between a United States port and a foreign port are exclusively governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act and federal maritime law, thus preempting application of state-law claims. Removal to federal court of such a complaint is therefore authorized even though it may be pled solely in terms of state-law claims. As such, plaintiffs motion to remand is Denied.
STATEMENT
In September of 2006 a large shipment of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- M3 Midstream LLC v. South Jersey Port Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014