Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Bonilla
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2012No. 11-4765PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
After he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry, Francisco Bonilla received an enhanced sentence based on his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation. Bonilla argues that the district court erred in applying the enhancement because his state conviction under Texas Penal Code section 30.02(a)(3) — which provides that “[a] person commits [burglary] if, without the effective consent of the owner, the person ...…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Timothy Allen WennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. ConstanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Wakinyan McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Jerry Van Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Roberto Moreno PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.