United States v. Constante
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant Guadalupe Con-stante, III appeals his sentence of fifteen years imprisonment and five years supervised release imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm subsequent to a felony conviction. Constante’s principal argument on appeal is that the district court erred in concluding that his prior burglary convictions under § 30.02(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code were violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). We agree, and we VACATE the sentence and REMAND the case to the district court for resentencing.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Gu…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Latroy BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Francisco BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.