Legal Opinion

United States v. Constante

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2008No. 07-41004PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Guadalupe Con-stante, III appeals his sentence of fifteen years imprisonment and five years supervised release imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm subsequent to a felony conviction. Constante’s principal argument on appeal is that the district court erred in concluding that his prior burglary convictions under § 30.02(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code were violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). We agree, and we VACATE the sentence and REMAND the case to the district court for resentencing.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Gu…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Latroy BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Francisco BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Michael HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API