Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Sharp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from County Court of Travis. Tried below before Hon. A. 8. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

Opinion on Motion for Rehearing.—At a former sitting this court reversed and remanded this cause, holding that the trial court erred in permitting the plaintiffs to- resort to secondary evidence to prove the terms of the written contract sued upon. After further consideration of the question on motion for rehearing, aided materially by the printed argument filed by appellee’s counsel, we- have reached the conclusion that our former decision was wrong, and that the ruling of the trial court was correct.

This suit is based upon a written contract, an alleged copy of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hooker v. . Eagle Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Hamilton v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Reliance Lumber Co. v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Dana v. ConantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Dean v. BorderTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Grayburg Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Torres v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Gore v. Citizens State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Torres v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API