Legal Opinion

United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 31, 1993No. 2:90-CV-326-RLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

The Plaintiff, the United States (“United States”) brought this action against Bethlehem Steel Corporation (“Bethlehem”) alleg ing that Bethlehem violated the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq., and the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. § 300f, et seq. In an order dated March 19, 1993, 829 F.Supp. 1023, this Court found that Bethlehem failed to perform the corrective action program required by two Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) Permits that the Environmental Protection Agency (the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McLouth Steel Products Corporation v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, and U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ekco Housewares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. A-C Reorganization Trust v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  3. United States v. Jg-24, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
  4. United States v. WCI Steel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. United States v. Torlaw Realty, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API