Legal Opinion

Garner v. Amsler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 27, 1964No. 5108PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an application by the appellants, two lawyers living in Memphis,’ Tennessee, for a writ of certiorari to review a judgment finding them to be in contempt of the' Pulaski Circuit Court. They contend that their conduct did not constitute contempt of court and, secondarily, that the punishment imposed is excessive.

These two attorneys, James 0. Garner and Bernard M. Rosen, were representing the defendants in a civil action that had been set for trial on December 19, 1963. That morning they first filed a motion for a continuance, on the ground that they had been unable to employ local…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Pace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Tupy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carle v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Dennison v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. R.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Burradell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Page v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API