Fischer & Co. v. Anslyn
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Hon. George W. Lubke, Judge. The plaintiff has not adduced any evidence entitling him to a lien against tbe interest of Caroline Dixon in said land or improvements, and, moreover, be has not .even attempted to charge her interest with a lien. ■ Coe v. Ritter, 86 Mo. 277. The account filed by plaintiff shows his clearly expressed intention that it shall apply ■only against tbe interest .of Walter Dixon.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Hon. George W. Lubke, Judge. The plaintiff has not adduced any evidence entitling him to a lien against tbe interest of Caroline Dixon in said land or improvements, and, moreover, be has not .even attempted to charge her interest with a lien. ■ Coe v. Ritter, 86 Mo. 277. The account filed by plaintiff shows his clearly expressed intention that it shall apply ■only against tbe interest .of Walter Dixon. Tbe case of Meyer v. Broadwell, 83 Mo. 571, was a suit on a mechanic’s lien. The work was done on tbe land of tbe ■wife at the instance of tbe husband,…
1Opinion of the CourtPeers, J.
This is a suit commenced before a justice of the peace on a mechanic’s lien. In this action plaintiff .seeks to recover one hundred and fifty dollars, for materials furnished by him to defendant, Gerard D. Anslyn, a subcontractor under defendant, Louis A. Anslyn, the contractor with the defendant, Walter T. Dixon, the owner, for the construction of a two-story frame building situated upon the lot of ground described in the plaintiff’s petition.
Walter T. Dixon and Caroline C. Dixon were husband and wife and a living child had been born of their marriage. Each owns a certain right, title, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hord v. TaubmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Wannall v. KemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Gray v. DrydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Urton v. SherlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Gitchell v. MessmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roeckeler Lumber Co. v. WahlbrinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Thomson v. BastMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hughes Bros. Paint & Hardware Co. v. PrewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Fathman & Miller Planing Mill Co. v. ChristophelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Tapee v. Varley-Wolter Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.