Legal Opinion

Wannall v. Kem

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1872PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Lousiana Court of Common Pleas. cited Stephens vs. Montgomery, 20 Ark. 373; Carney vs. Hopple, 17 Ohio State, 16. cited Chauvin vs. Wagner, 18 Mo., 531.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

*151This was an action in the nature of a bill in equity to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Kern and wife, on land belonging to the wife in fee, to secure a note alleged to have been executed by Kem and wife to the plaintiff’s indorser. The mortgage is dated the 18th of January, 1869, and was acknowledged before the defendant A. L. Loucks as notary public. The acknowledgment was properly made, but the notary public failed to state in his certificate of acknowledgment the facts necessary to constitute a good acknowledgment by husband and wife to a conveyance of the wife’s lands.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chauvin v. Wagner & DorsettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. Moreau v. DetchemendySupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wannell v. KemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Flesh v. LindsaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Mueller v. KaessmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Griffith v. VentressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Hord v. TaubmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API