Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defense counsel’s request for an adjournment since counsel had ample time to prepare for trial and failed to establish any prejudice (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 283-284; People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402, 405). Moreover, from our review of the record, we find that defendant was provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Disagreement over trial strategy or tactics does not render counsel’s assistance ineffective (see, People v Montana, 71 NY2d 705, 708). We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. QueeglayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API