GTE Products Corp. v. Gee
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF GTE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.
The defendants have filed six notices of depositions (##64-79). Each of the notices states that "... the defendants, by their attorneys, will take the deposition upon oral examination of [the plaintiff] GTE Products Corporation, by [a named person] on [a given date] ...”. The plaintiff alleges that none of the named persons are either officers, directors, or managing agents of the plaintiff, and, therefore, the defendants may not take the deposition of the plaintiff-corporation by these…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mompoint v. Lotus Development Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Afram Lines (USA), Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- CREST INFINITI, II, LP v. SwintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Cadent Ltd. v. 3M Unitek Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Globe Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.