Powers v. Buckowitz
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
While this action originated as a partition suit, the plaintiff, William L. Powers, claiming a one-fourth interest in the property, the trial court has construed a deed and found that the defendant, Georgia M. Buckowitz, is the fee-simple owner and that the plaintiff has no title or claim to the property. Therefore, even though the action was originally a partition suit (Mack v. Mack, Mo., 281 S.W.2d 872), title to real estate is involved and jurisdiction of the appeal is in this court. Const.Mo. Art. 5, Sec. 3, V.A.M.S.; Tillman v. Melton, 350 Mo. 155, 165 S.W.2d 684;…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodney v. LandauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- MacK v. MacKSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Ashauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Holloway v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- McClendon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Arzberger v. GrantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Johnson v. WoodardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Adams v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Gassner v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.