Legal Opinion

Powers v. Buckowitz

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1961No. 47941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

While this action originated as a partition suit, the plaintiff, William L. Powers, claiming a one-fourth interest in the property, the trial court has construed a deed and found that the defendant, Georgia M. Buckowitz, is the fee-simple owner and that the plaintiff has no title or claim to the property. Therefore, even though the action was originally a partition suit (Mack v. Mack, Mo., 281 S.W.2d 872), title to real estate is involved and jurisdiction of the appeal is in this court. Const.Mo. Art. 5, Sec. 3, V.A.M.S.; Tillman v. Melton, 350 Mo. 155, 165 S.W.2d 684;…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodney v. LandauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. MacK v. MacKSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Ashauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Holloway v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. McClendon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Arzberger v. GrantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Johnson v. WoodardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Adams v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. Gassner v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API