Legal Opinion

Gassner v. Cromer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1986No. 48854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

The original opinion in this case is withdrawn. This new opinion is issued to clarify matters raised by respondent Barbara Cromer on Motion For Rehearing and to afford the dissent an opportunity to certify this case to the Supreme Court.

Plaintiff Tillie Gassner appeals from judgment declaring plaintiff and defendant Barbara Cromer to be the owners of residential real estate in the City of St. Louis as tenants in common. The judgment was entered on Count I of the petition on the basis of an agreed statement of facts and exhibits referred to in the statement. The court dismissed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Niederkorn v. NiederkornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Longacre v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Keller v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Fairmont Foods Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Century Financial Services Group, Ltd. v. BatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Century Financial Services Group, Ltd. v. Sun Sound AudioMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API