State v. Pierson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Chapman, J., entered March 6, 1917, upon a trial and conviction of subscribing to a false paper with intent to deceive the state bank examiner.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The defendant in this case was charged, by amended information, with the crime of subscribing to a false paper with intent to deceive the state bank examiner. To this amended information, which will hereafter be referred to as the information, a demurrer was interposed upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. The demurrer being overruled, the cause in due time came on for trial, and resulted in a verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crime charged. A motion for a new trial being made and overruled, the defendant appeals.
The facts sufficient for an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. SniderWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. TwiningSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- Territory v. Heywood, Washington Territory1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. EstillWashington Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.