Legal Opinion

State v. Twining

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Oil error to Monmouth Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Fort, J.

The defendants were convicted in the Monmouth Quarter Sessions for exhibiting to an examiner of the state banking department a certain false paper, knowing it to be false, with the intent to deceive such examiner as to the condition of the Monmouth Trust and Safe .Deposit Company, of which company Twining was the president and Cornell the treasurer. The false paper consisted of a typewritten eopjr of a minute of an alleged meeting of the board of directors of the trust company, which meeting was in fact never held.

The minute purports to bo an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Potter v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  3. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. Dickinson v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PiersonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. MarinellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. State v. CorbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. State v. O'LEARYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API