Legal Opinion

State v. Estill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1957No. 33748PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Ermie Estill appeals from a conviction under an information, the charging part of which reads:

“She, the said Ermie Estill, in the County of King, State of Washington, on or about the 27th day of May, 1955, being an applicant for and recipient of Public Assistance, then and there, willfully, unlawfully and feloniously did make and subscribe an application, statement or other paper, to-wit: a Resource Statement in which the said Ermie Estill stated that she did not own and had no interest in any automobile and that she, the said Ermie Estill had not been employed within the two years prior to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ClaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. RioWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Balandzich v. DemerotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State v. RichardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API