Petit v. U.S. Department of Education
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Idea Claim; Denying the Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on the Idea Claim
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter concerns a regulation promulgated by the U.S. Department of Education (“the Department”) that excludes cochlear implant mapping as a service covered under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“the IDEA” or “the Act”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. The plaintiffs, parents of children with cochlear im plants, argue that the regulation violates the IDEA and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petit v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Petit v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012