Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Brookstone Mortg. Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2005No. 2:03-CV-729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or, alternatively, for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Interfirst Wholesale Mortgage Lending (Doc. # 57) and on the Plaintiffs Second Motion for Class Certification (Doc. # 50). For the reasons that follow, the Defendant’s motion is granted and the Plaintiffs motion is denied as moot.

I

Plaintiff, Ruth Morrison [“Plaintiff’], brings this action on behalf of herself and a purported class of individuals challenging certain charges, costs and/or fees associated with a residential real estate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Poblete v. Indymac BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Laudani v. Tribeca Lending Corp. (In Re Laudani)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Miller v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Laskowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  4. Weingartner v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  5. Stith v. ThorneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API