Legal Opinion

Vest v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 30, 1946No. 39513PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The plaintiff is a barber. He sues to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of Kansas City providing for the physical examination of barbers and for the inspection of barber shops on the ground the ordinance conflicts with similar provisions of the State statute which regulates barbering.

Barbering has long been regarded as an occupation properly subject to regulation for the protection of the public health. Ex parte Lucas, 160 Mo. 218, 61 S. W. 218. Such regulation has been exercised both by the State and by municipalities. Cities of the first, second, and third classes are expressly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. City of St. Louis v. KlausmeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Kansas City v. LaRoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Page Western, Inc. v. Community Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API