R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shirley Fingerhood, J.
Defendant moves for summary judgment under CPLR .3212 on the ground that plaintiff’s claims1 under section 368-d of the New York General Business Law are barred by the res judicata effect of Mushroom Makers v Barry Corp. (441 F Supp 1220, affd 580 F2d 44, cert den 439 US 1116) (hereinafter the Federal action).
The question presented here is whether Barry, the prior user of the trade-mark ’’mushrooms” is estopped from suing to enjoin the use of the same mark by defendant under section 368-d of the General Business Law, the State antidilution statute,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kwan v. SchleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Calzaturificio Rangoni S.P.A. v. United States Shoe Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Fourth Toro Family Ltd. Partnership v. PV Bakery, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Wedgwood Homes, Inc. v. LundOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- LPD New York, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.