Legal Opinion

R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Shirley Fingerhood, J.

Defendant moves for summary judgment under CPLR .3212 on the ground that plaintiff’s claims1 under section 368-d of the New York General Business Law are barred by the res judicata effect of Mushroom Makers v Barry Corp. (441 F Supp 1220, affd 580 F2d 44, cert den 439 US 1116) (hereinafter the Federal action).

The question presented here is whether Barry, the prior user of the trade-mark ’’mushrooms” is estopped from suing to enjoin the use of the same mark by defendant under section 368-d of the General Business Law, the State antidilution statute,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kwan v. SchleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Calzaturificio Rangoni S.P.A. v. United States Shoe Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Fourth Toro Family Ltd. Partnership v. PV Bakery, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Wedgwood Homes, Inc. v. LundOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. LPD New York, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API